ChaseChat - Forrest Fenn's Forum

Full Version: Fenn Treasure Hunters Point of View
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
First and foremost I will try my best to address all issues as I know them in the chase drama.
It is unfortunate that certain searchers try to use an illusion of power, position, or influence to secretly leech information out of Forrest Fenn and mislead the chase community. I have remained silent because I did not get the information that they have talked about.
First issue was the 200’ searcher comment. That conversation was relayed to me from Kpro on 4 July 2018. After Forrest had told me there was one person that he knew of that was the closest to the chest. He said “One person, not a searcher went out one time and was the closest that I knew of. “ That was all that was said to me. After we left Forrest House Kpro told me it was the 200’ searcher and if we found him, we’d find the chest. I payed it no attention. My visit with Forrest was not about the treasure, we talked primarily of military stories as old vets do. The only one bringing up the treasure chest was Kpro. Hell, I didn’t even tell Forrest where I was searching when he asked me. I did not want to waste the time talking about the treasure when I had the opportunity to meet the legendary Forrest Fenn.
All the things that David Kramer had brought up on Sean’s Show was news to me and I had never heard them before. Those conversations never happened in my presence. I see no reason for David to lie about what was told to him.
The phone call and daily contact with Forrest does not happen. However, it was asked about David’s character by Forrest because Forrest never said those things to Kpro in which David revealed. However, so many other searchers knew about this info before I did (from David during the show) It only leads me to believe that they were said by Kpro. Perhaps she misunderstood a conversation that she had with Forrest or intentionally lied to the fellow searchers. We will never know. I do not have daily contact with Forrest, however, occasionally he will respond to my non-search related emails. The one email I did receive he asked me not to have a panel on my YouTube channel because we already have enough Soap Operas.
This is the only time I will address this issue and will not answer questions. Here is all the info I have. I hope this helps clear the air. I do not believe Forrest gives special clues to anyone. Searchers misinterpret what Forrest says all the time…for validation of this just look at the Blogs and comments from when he answers questions on Mysterious Writings or throws out random words. We all go nuts!
Jason, thank you for clearing the air by providing your insight.

It has always confused me how Kpro likes to say let’s talk about the Chase (as in solve the poem) but hardly ever posts about the poem clues. I guess we now know why.
How would Forrest Fenn know if a non-searcher were within 200 feet of the treasure chest? This person would not have contacted Forrest. So how would Forrest know? Also can you add a time/date to this convo?
(10-27-2018, 05:12 PM)total1ty Wrote: [ -> ]How would Forrest Fenn know if a non-searcher were within 200 feet of the treasure chest? This person would not have contacted Forrest. So how would Forrest know? Also can you add a time/date to this convo?

"...on 4 July 2018...One person, not a searcher went out one time and was the closet (sic!) that he knew of...."


On July 1, 2018, an article was published where it was stated that one "hunter" (no longer a searcher) got within 200 feet of the treasure.

The quote: "Fenn says that one hunter got within 200 feet of the treasure, but so far, no one has found it..."

The article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/margieg.../#51f78c3c39ac

One of my favorite articles.



Research, Learning and Adjustment should be constants throughout the continuum.

• Researchers are those who have no BOTG experiences
• Searchers have gone BOTG but, typically, are influenced by their own experiences in determining their search areas
• Hunter(s) have gone BOTG, likely several times, and put themselves in the frame of mind of the hunted (or in this case, the hider)
• Finder has identified the location of the chest, say within a 12 foot radius
• Retriever will be the one who takes the chest from its hiding spot

Theoretically, a Researcher could leap frog to Finder level but could never be a Retriever without BOTG. The probability of such a jump to this level from Researcher is very unlikely.

This summer, Mr. Fenn indicated that "...one hunter has been within 200 feet...". This leads me to believe that, while several Searchers may have been within 200 feet, they likely did not know the significance of the location(s) they were in, therefore, they were not truly in the mind of the hider. Those Searchers may well dismiss the location and focus attention on another solution or area while the Hunter has honed in on something that others have missed and Mr. Fenn recognized the Hunter's persistence with his comment.

Peace,

CJ ("Inohury")
someone being "not a searcher" at the time they were close .. or are "no longer searching" are 2 very different things

based on a certain public comment from f, the person who was closest was a searcher (at least at the time)

(10-27-2018, 04:53 PM)Blazehunter Wrote: [ -> ]The phone call and daily contact with Forrest does not happen. However, it was asked about David’s character by Forrest because Forrest never said those things to Kpro in which David revealed. However, so many other searchers knew about this info before I did (from David during the show) It only leads me to believe that they were said by Kpro.

the use of the english language here is so unclear as to what you're even saying

(10-27-2018, 04:53 PM)Blazehunter Wrote: [ -> ]Perhaps she misunderstood a conversation that she had with Forrest or intentionally lied to the fellow searchers. We will never know.

perhaps kpro misunderstood or perhaps she lied. or perhaps she didn't

this doesn't clear the air or clarify anything
(10-27-2018, 05:18 PM)Chris Yates Wrote: [ -> ]someone being "not a searcher" at the time they were close .. or are "no longer searching" are 2 very different things

based on a certain public comment from f, the person who was closest was a searcher (at least at the time)

(10-27-2018, 04:53 PM)Blazehunter Wrote: [ -> ]The phone call and daily contact with Forrest does not happen. However, it was asked about David’s character by Forrest because Forrest never said those things to Kpro in which David revealed. However, so many other searchers knew about this info before I did (from David during the show) It only leads me to believe that they were said by Kpro.

the use of the english language here is so unclear as to what you're even saying

(10-27-2018, 04:53 PM)Blazehunter Wrote: [ -> ]Perhaps she misunderstood a conversation that she had with Forrest or intentionally lied to the fellow searchers. We will never know.

perhaps kpro misunderstood or perhaps she lied. or perhaps she didn't

this doesn't clear the air or clarify anything

...or Perhaps she didn't...You are correct
All of this seems very unreliable now. Like I said, Forrest may be giving everyone important information, but the veracity of the information depends on popularity of the messenger. Others who talk about or claim this kind of contact with Forrest are ridiculed and marginalized.

What’s funny is that Hairy’s has its very own “bunny.” Davis tongue is bleeding again.


razyfamily
(10-27-2018, 05:13 PM)inohury Wrote: [ -> ]"...on 4 July 2018...One person, not a searcher went out one time and was the closet (sic!) that he knew of...."


On July 1, 2018, an article was published where it was stated that one "hunter" (no longer a searcher) got within 200 feet of the treasure.

The quote: "Fenn says that one hunter got within 200 feet of the treasure, but so far, no one has found it..."

Peace,

CJ ("Inohury")

Note the "one hunter" statement in the Forbes article is not a quotation. Whether or not Forrest actually used the word "hunter" is unclear.
(10-28-2018, 08:56 AM)John Brown Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-27-2018, 05:13 PM)inohury Wrote: [ -> ]"...on 4 July 2018...One person, not a searcher went out one time and was the closet (sic!) that he knew of...."


On July 1, 2018, an article was published where it was stated that one "hunter" (no longer a searcher) got within 200 feet of the treasure.

The quote: "Fenn says that one hunter got within 200 feet of the treasure, but so far, no one has found it..."

Peace,

CJ ("Inohury")

Note the "one hunter" statement in the Forbes article is not a quotation. Whether or not Forrest actually used the word "hunter" is unclear.


Noted. That's part of what makes this article so cool...read it again and look for inconsistencies in numbers and names. That's all I can say on this matter.

Peace,

Inohury
(10-28-2018, 08:19 AM)crazyfamily Wrote: [ -> ]All of this seems very unreliable now. Like I said, Forrest may be giving everyone important information, but the veracity of the information depends on popularity of the messenger. Others who talk about or claim this kind of contact with Forrest are ridiculed and marginalized.

What’s funny is that Hairy’s has its very own “bunny.” Davis tongue is bleeding again.


razyfamily
Hairy's bunny now that is really funny!. That Hairy bunny is going down, thank you Jason for clarifying what many of us suspected.
Pages: 1 2