ChaseChat - Forrest Fenn's Forum

Full Version: Covington
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
CNN and Wapo are getting sued big time over the Nick Sandman debacle. I hope they lose. people need to be held accountable. it isn't justified just because someone wants to push their leftist lies (false narratives)

like it says in the video, nobody is safe if they can get away with this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H48UX7k2F5M
Wow, you’re so out on a limb here Chris. Careful, someone might accuse you of being an activist. I’ve never heard of a defamation lawsuit, is that something new?


razyfamily
(03-14-2019, 10:55 PM)Chris Yates Wrote: [ -> ]CNN and Wapo are getting sued big time over the Nick Sandman debacle. I hope they lose. people need to be held accountable. it isn't justified just because someone wants to push their leftist lies (false narratives)

like it says in the video, nobody is safe if they can get away with this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H48UX7k2F5M

I agree completely. CNN and Wapo totally failed to do ANY investigating. So much for "journalistic integrity". Phfffttt. I also hope they lose.
What's the matter, CF? No snappy come back?? No claims of first amendment privilege? And as for never hearing of a defamation lawsuit.....Seriously? Apparently you never heard about - or conveniently forgot about it - FLOTUS's defamation lawsuit against the scumbag blogger who called her an escort. She won by the way, or more to the point, the scumbag settled.

I sincerely hope that Sandman's lawyers sue the pants off NBC, a host of celebrities, and everyone else who piled on with NO evidence whatsoever that this kid did anything wrong.
(03-15-2019, 01:24 PM)crazyfamily Wrote: [ -> ]Wow, you’re so out on a limb here Chris. Careful, someone might accuse you of being an activist. I’ve never heard of a defamation lawsuit, is that something new?

Speaking of a defamation lawsuit, here's a challenge for you, CF. We all have biases, but I ask you to temporarily put yours aside and listen to the entirety of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ . This video contains the comment: "The Clintons are criminals, remember that." He makes other negative comments about the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation. Why was no lawsuit filed against the person making these claims? He made them in very public and well-attended venues, and now it's on YT for all the world to see, yet not a peep from the real perps.

Truth is kryponite (edit: kryptonite) to all things, and especially slander and defamation. What evidence might be introduced during discovery had the party in question sued?

There is one man in government who consistently fights for the people of this country, yet we hear, see, and are interminably led to believe he is the enemy. Why is that? Here's another challenge for you, CF: How many different individuals sit at the very tip of the various corporate constructs that control what >80% of the U.S. population sees, hears, and/or reads on a daily basis (hint: it's a very small number)? With that point in mind, why are daily talking points across legacy media/news outlets nearly identical. Have you noticed gradually increasing upticks in not-so-subtle political messaging in "entertainment" TV programming (pun intended)?

I'm guessing you're aware there's no crime in political activism, as your comment seems to imply in the "... Trump Thread": "The RNC is aware of the problem...". You don't appear to be advocating violence, you're merely passing along what appears to be factual information - though it's not yet formally in the public domain. Perhaps you're aware of this, too, but I'll state it anyway; there have been at least a dozen attempts, and I'm sure there will be more - extremely desperate minds resort to extreme desperation. What do THEY have to lose that would make them so desperate to undertake such a thing? Do you REALLY know who your friends are? Your enemies?

Have a nice day.
QQ
I’m so sick of everyone claiming this or that injustice. If there’s a law broken, then settle it in court. I don’t give a shit. If wapo and others violated that kids character then a jury will surely find in his favor. I don’t care. If the Clinton’s are guilty of something then they should have been taken to court. Please, someone take all of these liberals to court so we can finally hear the end of all of this injustice....oh my lord! the universe is so unfair!!


razyfamily
(03-17-2019, 09:24 AM)crazyfamily Wrote: [ -> ]I’m so sick of everyone claiming this or that injustice. If there’s a law broken, then settle it in court. I don’t give a shit. If wapo and others violated that kids character then a jury will surely find in his favor. I don’t care. If the Clinton’s are guilty of something then they should have been taken to court. Please, someone take all of these liberals to court so we can finally hear the end of all of this injustice....oh my lord! the universe is so unfair!!

I can't help but notice you didn't accept my challenges above but, not to fear, a third one follows below. Importantly, my best guess is your if/thens are likely to be fulfilled soon - and many more you've probably not even imagined. Well done on that part.

I believe any serious response to this is unlikely, but I ask this again only because it's very important: Do you know who "THEY" are?
OO

EDIT: One final point: It's not about liberal/conservative, black/white, Muslim/Christian, or most other this/thats currently occupying news' cycles. It's all about right versus wrong/good versus evil - and choice.
(03-17-2019, 06:40 AM)brubr Wrote: [ -> ]What's the matter, CF? No snappy come back?? No claims of first amendment privilege? And as for never hearing of a defamation lawsuit.....Seriously? Apparently you never heard about - or conveniently forgot about it - FLOTUS's defamation lawsuit against the scumbag blogger who called her an escort. She won by the way, or more to the point, the scumbag settled.

I sincerely hope that Sandman's lawyers sue the pants off NBC, a host of celebrities, and everyone else who piled on with NO evidence whatsoever that this kid did anything wrong.


Here’s my snappy comeback...

I tried posting pictures here of the First Lady, but they were censored. Maybe she’s not an escort, but her pornographic pictures do not meet the high standards of this platform.


razyfamily
(03-17-2019, 03:32 PM)Seeker9 Wrote: [ -> ]https://youtu.be/MUiYglgGbos

EXCELLENT video, Seeker. Thanks!
Pages: 1 2