ChaseChat - Forrest Fenn's Forum
Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - Printable Version

+- ChaseChat - Forrest Fenn's Forum (https://www.chasechat.com)
+-- Forum: Forum (https://www.chasechat.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: The Therapy Room (https://www.chasechat.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours (/showthread.php?tid=10010)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42


Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - Mindy - 12-19-2018

(12-19-2018, 01:43 PM)Bet Wrote: Made a mistake of stopping by the asylum today.....
Davis is still in need of his meds.....there needs to be a designated room for misogyny.
Why is it the guys that are zeros always trash a woman’s physical appearance. Must be projection.

“Mitty must be really seething with jealousy over the attention Cynthia got to pull out that ancient surfboard photo. I wonder if that sort of ancient stuff is what she tried to entice Fenn with, rather than the saggy, droopy, jowly, wrinkled, varicose veined reality of today.”

Njfl needs to attend the same group therapy session as Davis. Time to move on from the Mindy hate. Seems like she has moved on with her life in a healthy way, so should you.


Lol. I should seriously do a Mindy Edition of Mean Tweets and try to get through reading a few without laughing hysterically.

Ohhh, I know I shouldn’t encourage a maelstrom of hate this will stir up, but I’m going to respond to njfl’s false accusations. Just because it’s my right.

njfl says:

“When Mindy was in her Ms Forever yours mode, she sent Fenn hundreds of emails and pics. When Mindy is in her #metoo mode she complains about Fenn manipulating people. When Mindy was in her Ms Forever yours mode she went to visit Fenn at his home last year. When Mindy is in her #metoo mode she is trashng Fenn online.

So the reader, IMO, can infer here that Mindy is the one who is actually trying to manipulate people's thoughts by continually switching gears to suit her at any given time. And what kind of a woman sends an 80 something year old man bikini pics and suggestive emails IN THE FIRST PLACE KNOWING he is married? And how would Mindy or anyone else know how Fenn treated his wife? Did Mindy live there everyday to witness anything? No she didn't. So that right there proves my point. Mindy is the manipulative person here.”

1. I did not send F “hundreds” of pics. I sent one pic with my surfboard, big whoop, I live in FL and surfing is a passion. It’s not “suggestive” in the least. I did not send F “suggestive” emails—try turning that the other way around.
2. Treating your wife with such blatant disrespect by flirting (and more) with countless female searchers is enough to justify me saying that he treated his wife badly.
3. By the way you twist everything and supply false info to support your jaded argument, I can reasonably infer YOU are trying to manipulate people into believing your false facts.

njfl says:

“Then there's the posting of knee surgery pictures, thyroid surgery pictures, mother in a nursing home pictures, bathing suit pictures, mental illness diagnosis, picture of medical records, etc and they were all posted on CC. Who is it that cares about her fame? Who is it that solicits compliments and sympathy? Remember what Fenn said, “It’s not who you are, it’s who THEY think you are.”

1. You don’t have to read my blog. I’ve been blogging for years about my DAILY LIFE, and knee surgery, thyroid surgery, and my mom were parts of my daily life. I was not trying to gain sympathy, or influence anyone’s thoughts. I was simply posting daily life.
2. However, you again twist facts. I DO NOT have a MENTAL ILLNESS. I have never said that (however, members of Harry’s are quick to diagnose me without having ever met me face to face). I have posted a medical record ONLY once, to combat some ugly, false assumptions made by members of Harry’s. Did I post knee surgery or thyroid pics to CC? If I did, I believe it was because many people wanted to know how I was doing. Wasn’t trying to gain sympathy or influence anyone. Was simply posting an update, and trying to inject a little humor into the situation.
3. I remember posting one pic of my mom — which again was to prove a member of Harry’s wrong in his false and cruel assumption that I was exaggerating my mom’s condition to gain sympathy. Shame on you, njfl, for even mentioning that when you surely know the truth.
4. The only bathing suit pic I posted on CC is the one with my surfboard, so why do you say “PICS?” Plural? And again, that was posted to combat another false reporting by one of Harry’s members. Do I not have the right to defend myself against ugly and cruel false assumptions?
5.
Then njfl says:

“The self proclaimed "Mata Hari" speaks.”

1. When did I EVER proclaim myself a Mata Hari? Again, fake news thrown out as fact.
2. What is your agenda against me, njfl? Why the intensity of venom in your accusations, and why speak false when you know the truth?
3. I would invite you to send me an email so we can talk about whatever it is without resorting to spreading false facts as truth. mindyfausey@yahoo.com. Email me and I’ll give you my phone number so we can talk like grown ups.

Finally, njfl says:

“Readers, look carefully at who wants to have "the sheep of followers" who believe everything that comes out of someone's mouth.”

1. The thing is, njfl, is I can prove everything I say. You simply can’t. You can’t prove my motives or intentions. You can’t prove anything you have said above—that I have posted things to CC with the motives of trying to garner sympathy or attention. In fact, many of the things you are complaining about me posting were posted as a result of false claims made by members of Harry’s, and I was defending myself against lies. Is there something wrong with that???




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


RE: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - fundamental design - 12-19-2018

(12-19-2018, 11:55 AM)crazyfamily Wrote: I'm feeling particularly thoughtful today, so I will lend a hand to some dingleberries who are trying to think of other things. Don't know why he didn't start a new thread.

[Image: 4908dafcf43f7c675c5da4045ce6e10a.jpg]

Crowd sourcing is nothing new, and why I don't give too much away. But, and it's a big but, while it is a good idea to revisit statements from the past in the light of new information, there is already a whole boat load of information that cannot be processed because of the volume of the data. Forrest's big picture is just too big for us to see. I think there are times that parts of it are simple enough to make out the crude shape, but overall it just causes more confusion.

What I'm saying is, if you can't make the connection in what's already known, how will you find the one who made the connections that are already known. I've been trying to help inflate the value of CC by agreeing that there is something in here. Forrest told Special K that some who have solved the clues are on the blogs. It's natural to think that they were posting here, at least in the early days.

Forrest said, "who would do such a stupid thing" to which he answered "no one would do a stupid thing unless they were in my skin." So, the one who can figure out the clues needs to think exactly what Forrest was thinking. To find that person you would have to think what that person is thinking that Forrest was thinking.

On the blog, Forrest's thoughts, hints etc would be filtered through their words. It is, in my opinion, less likely than solving the poem.



I went and read a couple of those pages at The Home Of Recycled ideas, and I think that Special K is just applying a simple logic to her strategy. Special K doesn't believe that the 200 footer is posting at her site, so eliminate all of those who were at CC. Now, how many of the early searchers not on her site are still posting at CC. Then take a look at their posts and threads and note what they are saying at specific times. It would be interesting IF ALL of the posts were intact.

razyfamily

I’d guess Kpro offered a tidy sum for CC. New signature below.


Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - crazyfamily - 12-20-2018

(12-19-2018, 04:00 PM)fundamental design Wrote:
(12-19-2018, 11:55 AM)crazyfamily Wrote: I'm feeling particularly thoughtful today, so I will lend a hand to some dingleberries who are trying to think of other things. Don't know why he didn't start a new thread.

[Image: 4908dafcf43f7c675c5da4045ce6e10a.jpg]

Crowd sourcing is nothing new, and why I don't give too much away. But, and it's a big but, while it is a good idea to revisit statements from the past in the light of new information, there is already a whole boat load of information that cannot be processed because of the volume of the data. Forrest's big picture is just too big for us to see. I think there are times that parts of it are simple enough to make out the crude shape, but overall it just causes more confusion.

What I'm saying is, if you can't make the connection in what's already known, how will you find the one who made the connections that are already known. I've been trying to help inflate the value of CC by agreeing that there is something in here. Forrest told Special K that some who have solved the clues are on the blogs. It's natural to think that they were posting here, at least in the early days.

Forrest said, "who would do such a stupid thing" to which he answered "no one would do a stupid thing unless they were in my skin." So, the one who can figure out the clues needs to think exactly what Forrest was thinking. To find that person you would have to think what that person is thinking that Forrest was thinking.

On the blog, Forrest's thoughts, hints etc would be filtered through their words. It is, in my opinion, less likely than solving the poem.



I went and read a couple of those pages at The Home Of Recycled ideas, and I think that Special K is just applying a simple logic to her strategy. Special K doesn't believe that the 200 footer is posting at her site, so eliminate all of those who were at CC. Now, how many of the early searchers not on her site are still posting at CC. Then take a look at their posts and threads and note what they are saying at specific times. It would be interesting IF ALL of the posts were intact.

razyfamily

I’d guess Kpro offered a tidy sum for CC. New signature below.

Sacha believes that Special K has purchased ChaseChat and that James has verified it. Anyone? If this is true, then I'm out.

[Image: ac2d35b2b37e36212b89f50933bbecd1.jpg]

Confidential to lars, too bad your thread turned into just another throw away, Mindy-bashing thread. Maybe you should move to a better neighborhood.

razyfamily


Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - Mindy - 12-20-2018

(12-20-2018, 12:30 AM)crazyfamily Wrote:
(12-19-2018, 04:00 PM)fundamental design Wrote:
(12-19-2018, 11:55 AM)crazyfamily Wrote: I'm feeling particularly thoughtful today, so I will lend a hand to some dingleberries who are trying to think of other things. Don't know why he didn't start a new thread.

[Image: 4908dafcf43f7c675c5da4045ce6e10a.jpg]

Crowd sourcing is nothing new, and why I don't give too much away. But, and it's a big but, while it is a good idea to revisit statements from the past in the light of new information, there is already a whole boat load of information that cannot be processed because of the volume of the data. Forrest's big picture is just too big for us to see. I think there are times that parts of it are simple enough to make out the crude shape, but overall it just causes more confusion.

What I'm saying is, if you can't make the connection in what's already known, how will you find the one who made the connections that are already known. I've been trying to help inflate the value of CC by agreeing that there is something in here. Forrest told Special K that some who have solved the clues are on the blogs. It's natural to think that they were posting here, at least in the early days.

Forrest said, "who would do such a stupid thing" to which he answered "no one would do a stupid thing unless they were in my skin." So, the one who can figure out the clues needs to think exactly what Forrest was thinking. To find that person you would have to think what that person is thinking that Forrest was thinking.

On the blog, Forrest's thoughts, hints etc would be filtered through their words. It is, in my opinion, less likely than solving the poem.



I went and read a couple of those pages at The Home Of Recycled ideas, and I think that Special K is just applying a simple logic to her strategy. Special K doesn't believe that the 200 footer is posting at her site, so eliminate all of those who were at CC. Now, how many of the early searchers not on her site are still posting at CC. Then take a look at their posts and threads and note what they are saying at specific times. It would be interesting IF ALL of the posts were intact.

razyfamily

I’d guess Kpro offered a tidy sum for CC. New signature below.

Sacha believes that Special K has purchased ChaseChat and that James has verified it. Anyone? If this is true, then I'm out.

[Image: ac2d35b2b37e36212b89f50933bbecd1.jpg]

Confidential to lars, too bad your thread turned into just another throw away, Mindy-bashing thread. Maybe you should move to a better neighborhood.

razyfamily


Special K hasn’t bought CC, to my knowledge, because we are still here. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


RE: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - fundamental design - 12-20-2018

I wasn’t breaking any news. I was just guessing that Kpro offered more than what the clowns think she offered. Making an offer is a different thing than having a transaction completed after accepting an offer.

Sean of the Flop offered to possibly have Mindy and I on one of his shows. That doesn’t mean we would have taken him up on his offer in the end.


Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - crazyfamily - 12-20-2018

Oh the irony. Dr. Opinion is over there chewing his tongue off(again) and bleeding all over the place while Hairy justifies his self restraint in some kind of fatherly like advice. What a pathetic double standard.





razyfamily


RE: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - dude here - 12-21-2018

There seems to be a lot of common ground between this forum and Harry's lately. Kpro is dangerous and she is positioning herself to own the chase when/if Mr F ever departs.


RE: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - Milan - 12-21-2018

What bugs me the most is when people make bold statements on the forums based on blatant misinformation. Now more than ever can I somewhat relate to Mindy's constant battles with this community.

@seeker9 wrote: "How many chase forums has Milan been banned from?"

I NEVER asked kpro to ban me. Here are my exact words to her:

"Please remove my account if I can't figure out how."

So before I had a chance to delete my avatar, posts, and account she prevented me from doing so and placed a large banner across my avatar saying "Banned". That's fine, karma is a bitch sometimes.

Also, @seeker9, the only other forum that I've been banned from was HoD. This irks me to this day because I was banned because someone convinced Goofy-bastard that I posted something on Reddit that slandered Fenn - I didn't. I traced down who maliciously framed me, and then I felt bad because this person had other way more significant life-problems than this forum drama. Therefore, I let it go. I informed Dal at the time that it wasn't me, but he didn't have the decency to respond to me. I've never been a fan of Dal ever since.

So here's an answer to you seeker9: I haven't been banned from any forum for something I've done improperly.


RE: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - fundamental design - 12-21-2018

(12-21-2018, 01:10 PM)dude here Wrote: There seems to be a lot of common ground between this forum and Harry's lately. Kpro is dangerous and she is positioning herself to own the chase when/if Mr F ever departs.

I don’t think she’s dangerous.


RE: Hairy's Crack Lounge, Open 24 Hours - Seeker9 - 12-21-2018

(12-21-2018, 01:32 PM)Milan Wrote: What bugs me the most is when people make bold statements on the forums based on blatant misinformation. Now more than ever can I somewhat relate to Mindy's constant battles with this community.

@seeker9 wrote: "How many chase forums has Milan been banned from?"

I NEVER asked kpro to ban me. Here are my exact words to her:

"Please remove my account if I can't figure out how."

So before I had a chance to delete my avatar, posts, and account she prevented me from doing so and placed a large banner across my avatar saying "Banned". That's fine, karma is a bitch sometimes.

Also, @seeker9, the only other forum that I've been banned from was HoD. This irks me to this day because I was banned because someone convinced Goofy-bastard that I posted something on Reddit that slandered Fenn - I didn't. I traced down who maliciously framed me, and then I felt bad because this person had other way more significant life-problems than this forum drama. Therefore, I let it go. I informed Dal at the time that it wasn't me, but he didn't have the decency to respond to me. I've never been a fan of Dal ever since.

So here's an answer to you seeker9: I haven't been banned from any forum for something I've done improperly.
- Milan, I hope my post didn't upset you. Wasn't my intention.I enjoy most all of you postings, and I've never seen you post anything lewd or negative that would warrant a forum banning. I wish you good luck when you go out and search.