Not logged in. Login - Register


All new registrations need to be approved manually. After registration, mail me at tyblossom at aol dot com.
ChaseChat is available for Smartphones via Tapatalk, Download the app at http://tapatalk.com/m?id=4&referer=1048173. After installing CLICK HERE to add the forum to Tapatalk.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
06-19-2018, 07:30 PM,
#1
200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
Mr Fenn has Claimed that there has been searchers within both of these feet measurements. He has said that searchers have told him exactly where they were.

Now here’s my question! How do we know he knows exactly where they were. I mean exactly 200’ or 500’?
Reply
06-19-2018, 07:45 PM,
#2
200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
Because forrest already new the distance before hand that searcher would get that close because in the poem it says "FROM THERE" meaning this is somewhere that you can recognize.This is the 200ft mark.

Sent from my LG-M153 using Tapatalk
Reply
06-20-2018, 01:06 AM,
#3
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
This^. I have my (°) on you.. wow that turned out perfect^
Reply
06-20-2018, 02:38 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-20-2018, 02:41 AM by easternOHsteve.)
#4
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
Simple math - a squared plus b squared equals c squared. The height would be about 458 feet higher than the searcher's location. So, both dimensions could be correct.... The slope would be about 66 degrees (pretty steep) imo
just saying ss
Reply
06-20-2018, 03:54 AM,
#5
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
There is a rock formation just before my trip finish that is a fairly good double omega (two upside down horseshoes)... There is also an x where the 109 and 43 meet... f said something like his right hand was our left hand; think about that a moment to get the 109 and 43. Then add his statement about throwing his bike into the water high... In my trip only... IMO
just saying ss
Reply
06-20-2018, 10:06 PM,
#6
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
(06-20-2018, 03:54 AM)easternOHsteve Wrote: There is a rock formation just before my trip finish that is a fairly good double omega (two upside down horseshoes)... There is also an x where the 109 and 43 meet... f said something like his right hand was our left hand; think about that a moment to get the 109 and 43. Then add his statement about throwing his bike into the water high... In my trip only... IMO

In person face to face left is right right is left.
Are the shoes each on opposing sides of the river?
The water high would be nice, can you imagine though?
You regain cell service and can't help but email f just to let him know that you made it, again. How can I prove that puts you around 229 boots to the booty? Why would I? Look at the way you guys are treating each other. easternOHsteve, sorry I didn't notice this several hours ago.
It doesn't matter what it says if that's where it says it.
Reply
06-20-2018, 10:14 PM,
#7
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
(06-20-2018, 03:54 AM)easternOHsteve Wrote: There is a rock formation just before my trip finish that is a fairly good double omega (two upside down horseshoes)... There is also an x where the 109 and 43 meet... f said something like his right hand was our left hand; think about that a moment to get the 109 and 43. Then add his statement about throwing his bike into the water high... In my trip only... IMO

It wasnt a statement, it was a question. And the problem with that is because bikes aren't allowed there and it wouldn't fit in the "water high" anyhow.
Reply
06-21-2018, 01:32 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-21-2018, 01:36 AM by easternOHsteve.)
#8
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
(06-20-2018, 10:06 PM)heyoka Wrote:
(06-20-2018, 03:54 AM)easternOHsteve Wrote: There is a rock formation just before my trip finish that is a fairly good double omega (two upside down horseshoes)... There is also an x where the 109 and 43 meet... f said something like his right hand was our left hand; think about that a moment to get the 109 and 43. Then add his statement about throwing his bike into the water high... In my trip only... IMO

In person face to face left is right right is left.
Are the shoes each on opposing sides of the river?
The water high would be nice, can you imagine though?
You regain cell service and can't help but email f just to let him know that you made it, again. How can I prove that puts you around 229 boots to the booty? Why would I? Look at the way you guys are treating each other. easternOHsteve, sorry I didn't notice this several hours ago.
It doesn't matter what it says if that's where it says it.

How am I treating anyone anyway? I have never gotten upset with anyone on here; in fact, I have only corresponded with two or three persons asking them to partner for a week to finish my location and go to their location.
I have never said a cross word to anyone on here (I have been on Dal Nietzel's three times ever.) and have only given my opinion on the threads. I can only give a general response as every hint or interpretation of the poem is right there in my trip area...
There is no Net10 cell service within 45 or 50 miles of my search area; I think one carrier shows coverage but I only have Net10.
There is a ditch between them, but no water unless it rains. GE is 689 on the ground but, well, a lot less level-wise...
To clarify my statement about left and right; the poem and hints direct the searcher one way while saying "it" goes another. Of course we are to decipher the point to meet back up... But, most paramount, we are to use the searcher's prespective. This is all my opinion but your trip may be totally correct...
I don't really understand if you are addressing my statements or not??? I'm confused you seemed to answer my post???

(06-20-2018, 10:14 PM)DeeepThnkr Wrote:
(06-20-2018, 03:54 AM)easternOHsteve Wrote: There is a rock formation just before my trip finish that is a fairly good double omega (two upside down horseshoes)... There is also an x where the 109 and 43 meet... f said something like his right hand was our left hand; think about that a moment to get the 109 and 43. Then add his statement about throwing his bike into the water high... In my trip only... IMO

It wasnt a statement, it was a question. And the problem with that is because bikes aren't allowed there and it wouldn't fit in the "water high" anyhow.

I know that DT; you are correct. The hint was the water high, not that he could have ridden a bike there. IMO of course.
just saying ss
Reply
06-21-2018, 03:18 AM,
#9
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
Very good sir, wasn't trying to be demeaning if you took it that way. I like and relate to what you are righting. Hitch your horse good, it's going to be a duzzy.
Reply
06-21-2018, 11:49 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-21-2018, 11:55 PM by easternOHsteve.)
#10
RE: 200’ & 500’ searchers? 85 to 15% Honesty?
(06-21-2018, 03:18 AM)DeeepThnkr Wrote: Very good sir, wasn't trying to be demeaning if you took it that way. I like and relate to what you are righting. Hitch your horse good, it's going to be a duzzy.

The saddle fell off my horse for real DT... write in front of the rainbow. I don't think God looks only at any one person or is that a clue for CO? Well, that may be kind of correct.
just saying ss
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Searchers Clues to other Searchers 93 52,428 12-27-2016, 08:19 PM
Last Post: geydelkon

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Contact Us | ChaseChat™ - Treasure Chat | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication