THE HINTS- VITAL TO SUCCESS

[fundamental design]

Mr. Fundamental, no it is not subjective to know that indeed Mr. Redford was involved in writing "The Outlaw Trail" however, it may be subjective to then believe that that knowledge is somehow key in solving a clue e.g. WWWH.

This is why I feel it is vital to remove all subjectivity by focusing purely on the poem.

Great, it may be subjective to then believe that that knowledge is somehow key in solving a clue. Then again, this is a treasure hunt. And you have to go with something. My example fits the description of f's best advice and that it's an aberration. And it's a zillion times easier to see where can take someone than just picking wwwh out of the clues. What happens if the poem has a hint that points to the same area that Robert Redford explored in the book? I'd say one would be building confidence a lot faster than just picking a wwwh out of a hat.

Mr Fundametal, you said: "And you have to go with something" Please clarify what you mean by this, are you saying that one must guess? Just because this is a treasure hunt doesn't mean we have to throw a dart up against a board. Forrest has said, and I paraphrase, one will go with confidence or certainty, not "something".

You also said: "And it's a zillion times easier to see where can take someone than just picking wwwh out of the clues." It, I must assume refers to your mention of the Redford aberration in "Important Literature" Therefore I once again must say that this assumption of yours, that this aberration must then point to Browns Hole, is very subjective , not that it is wrong, but it is solely based upon an assumption that it is in fact a subtle hint to the "where" that warm water halt derives.

So here is my best advice to you, and this comes straight from the horses mouth:

"If you don't know where it is, go back to the poem." f

No, I'm not saying one must guess. I also said that the correct answer to the correct starting point is not gonna be given to us on a silver platter without us needing to use logic and reasoning to decipher how f hid the proper information. Do you agree that f said his best advice for serious searchers is to read the book (ttotc) then read the poem 9 or 10 times and then go back to the book and read it slowly trying to find somethings that trip up in your mind?

About your Robert Redford reference and Brown's Hole. Did I not predict upthread exactly what the two first questions or points would be after I said that. Lol
And didn't I say part of my response would be that is why I also use the poem hint hint high I feel points to the same area. Isn't that what we are trying to do? Find connections. My next response will probably be don't forget the other aberration in ttotc that also points to the same distinct area.

Mr. Fundamental, I believe you should step back and take an "objective" look at what has been discussed here, and for a moment set pride aside for reasoning. It has been entertaining conversing with you, but I sense you are reaching a point where you are beginning to gloss over. So with that said, I'll take my leave.

Be so kind to answer my question first. I've answered all of your questions. Funny how I'm the one not being objective when you leave right after I ask one question but won't answer it.

And actually I just have a pair of gloves on while I'm typing so I missed some typos. Ha

It's also funny that you came back with a response of Browns Park from me just posting that it's not true that Robert Redford didn't write a book. It proves my point that locations can be derived from even the most subtle of information in the book (btw, you picked the distinct location I would garner from that aberration). Thanks buddy for proving my point.