THE HINTS- VITAL TO SUCCESS

[fundamental design]

I had a discussion recently on Dal’s Odd and ends thread that llustrates the length that some searchers go to in portraying their position as correct. They don’t use proof and don’t use any knowledgeable response (just their opinion, lol) when you show proof. I think it’s important once in awhile to show that this happens on the blogs. It’s rare but what can you do when you see it but laugh and share with others so they have the knowledge.

In a nutshell, here’s what proceeded...one of the searchers on Dal’s asked me to give an example of what I thought a hint or two in ttotc might be that can introduce a specific geographical area on f’s treasure map since I think that might be how f designed the Chase.

So I provided two examples, first that Robert Redford did write a book and secondly that the famous explorer John Charles Fremont makes for a striking connection to the John Charles whatever story in TTOTC. Then, Jamie Jones posted that the John Charles Fremont connection was random, and therefore totally invalid, as the term “son of a b*tch” doesn’t mean “bast*rd”. And I was like hold on...I can show you how it does so my statement isn’t random or completely invalid. So, I showed that if one googles the definition of b*tch that one of the dictionaries has a definition stating “immoral woman”. To complete the connection, all I have to do is show that the mothers of bast*rds back in the time of John Charles Fremont were referred to as immoral women by the prevailing sentiment of the day. A little background...John Charles Fremont was born as an illegitimate child so obviously that part (a son) in both stories connects. I provided links that did just that. As I will here...