THE HINTS- VITAL TO SUCCESS

[fundamental design]

Care to explain what you mean by this “as most people know, f has been making comments since that seem to indicate someone is making progress. again, the treasure hasn't been found yet, but whoever this person(s) is/are, they are not "showing anything" otherwise we would know who they are...”

my point (which I already explained in my previous reply) is that if someone was showing anything, then we would know who they are, but it isn't possible for anyone to show anything therefore it is not possible for us to know who they are

let me know if you need me to say this 3 or 4 more times because I will

I don’t agree with what you are saying here as it is written. So, yeah, you might have to explain yourself better. I don’t agree with what you are saying about show “anything”. That’s a broad term. By using that term I think what you are saying is wrong.

Also, do you mean in public view? In your mind, why is it not possible to show “anything”?

---

I wasn’t claiming to know that Mdavis hasn’t made progress. I was claiming that he hasn’t “shown” any progress. Me saying “Mdavis hasn’t shown anything that shows that he has gotten any closer to figuring out the first clue, or beyond, by bypassing searching for book hints” means just that. My focus was on the first four words of the sentence “Mdavis hasn’t shown anything (while implying with his poem purist view)”. He hasn’t show any progress. Again, I don’t care what the reason is for why he hasn’t shown it. I win with any reason.

that mdavis hasn't shown any signs of making progress was exactly what you were claiming

there would be no point in you saying that, unless you are suggesting that a searcher can show progress

"I win with any reason" - obviously this means you can't support your argument with reason so you win no matter what, in your own mind

if you are acknowledging that mdavis can't show any progress because no searcher can show any progress, then you are acknowledging that there was no point to what you were saying

and if there was no point to what you were saying, then the simple fact would be that you were WRONG to try and use it as a knock on mdavis. you were trying to give this as a reason to discount the points mdavis made on that thread

I am not acknowledging what you think is some valuable thing to think. Obviously, I did not do as you are trying to portray since I think one can show progress with something in the Chase. I’ve been saying it for years on various threads and other places and I alluded to it on the previous thread we were discussing at. Plenty of other searchers’ eyeballs have witnessed that before. So, you’re gonna have to come up with some better evidence of what you think my intentions were.

On top of that, one can separate the two things. One can say that a certain searcher has not shown progress (allowing that it hasn’t been missed) and not mention any reason why. That can be the point they are making. They can also say what method that searcher is using and that wouldn’t be the reason why. It’s not that hard to reasonably show that. Lastly, like I said above, one can not agree with your basic contention so that would obviously go against their opinion about that. Don’t make sense on your part.